|
This report has been written for families who have one or more boys with
Duchenne muscular dystrophy. It explains some basic scientific facts and shows
the now numerous approaches with which research is trying to find a scientifically justified
and thus effective therapy of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Because
scientists in more than one hundred laboratories in many countries of the world
are working to find a cure for this disease, only the most important of their
results are described here in greater detail. Some further results are reported
in a strongly abbreviated fashion.
The first edition of this report in 2001 was based on an international workshop
on Duchenne therapy research in May 2000 at the National Institutes of Health
in Bethesda near Washington. This third edition of the report was written in July
and August 2003 mostly with information from the literature and by correspondence
with many of the researchers.
Introduction
Some basic scientific facts are explained, what genes are, how they work,
why dystrophin is important, how mutations cause Duchenne muscular dystrophy,
and how the disease is inherited.
Genes and their function:
Genes are functional units of
the genetic material in the chromosomes of each cell. This material is
desoxyribonucleic acid, DNA. Its structure looks like an intertwined
ladder, the double helix. It was detected by James Watson and
Francis Crick in 1953, 50 years ago. The two backbones or strands of
the ladder are long chains of phosphoric acid and desoxyribose, a kind of sugar.
The rungs consist of four different chemical substances, the bases or
genetic letters: adenine, guanine, thymine,
and cytosine, abbreviated A, G, T, and C, two of which always face each
other in one rung of the helix. For spatial reasons, the rungs can only contain
the pairs A-T or G-C. If the sequence of these bases on one strand is e.g.
---AGGCTTAATCGT---
the sequence on the opposite strand must be
---TCCGAATTAGCA---
i.e., the sequences are complementary to each other.
Each of the about 100 trillion (100 x 1012) body cells in a human
being contains in its nucleus 46 chromosomes with a total of more than 6 billion
genetic letters, grouped in about 25,000 to 35,000 genes. Almost all details of
the sequence of these letters are now known. It is the genetic information,
which is passed on from generation to generation with very little changes or
mutations. These mutations, which were necessary for the evolution of all
living beings, can also have negative consequences as, e.g., hereditary
diseases.
Most of the genes carry the information for the construction of one
or more proteins, which consist of amino acids. The sequence of
the amino acids, of which there are 20 different kinds, is important for
the function of the proteins such as enzymes, the catalysts for
biochemical reactions in the body, as regulators for other genes, or as
structural material.
In the cell nucleus, where the chromosomes reside, the genetic information
of the genes is copied or transcribed to another genetic substance
of a similar structure, the pre-messenger ribonucleic acid, pre-mRNA.
The genes of multicellular organisms consist of active sections, exons,
and inactive ones, introns. After the transcription, the introns,
which are often much longer than the exons, are removed from the pre-mRNA,
and the transcribed exons spliced together to the
messenger RNA, mRNA, which is then exported to the ribosomes,
the protein synthesizing structures in the cytoplasma of the cell. In the
ribosomes, catalytic acting RNAs, ribozymes, use the genetic information
of the mRNA to construct specific proteins out of amino acids which are delivered
to the ribosomes by another kind of RNA, the transfer RNAs or tRNAs.
The RNAs use the base U, uracil, instead of the very similar base T of the DNA.
In the mRNA, three consecutive genetic letters always signify one of the 20
different amino acids according to a genetic dictionary, the genetic code,
which is the same for all life on earth. Thus, the genetic script uses only four
letters, and its words, the codons, are always three letters long,
triplets. There are no spaces between the words, and three different
stop codons exist, UAA, UAG, and UGA, where the protein synthesis is
terminated.
Dystrophin gene:
Duchenne muscular dystrophy is one of the most frequent hereditary diseases.
About one in 3,500 boys is born with this disease, which is caused by a
mutation or damage of the dystrophin gene with the consequence
that the protein dystrophin is no longer present or exists only in traces in
their muscle cells.
The dystrophin gene was identified in 1986 on the X chromosome
(Kunkel, Boston) and its structure elucidated shortly afterwards
(Hoffman, Washington).With 2.6 million base pairs, it is the longest
gene of man. Only 0,5 % of the base pairs, 13,973, belong to the 79 exons of
the gene, which contain the active coding sequence, the information for
the synthesis of the different forms of the protein dystrophin. The
transcription of the genetic information of the dystrophin gene into mRNA is
under the control of five promoters, DNA regions governing the splicing
process so that a number of dystrophins of different length are produced.
The main product is the full-length dystrophin, a very long protein consisting
of 3,685 amino acids.
Dystrophin is part of the costamers, which connect the Z discs of the
sarcomers, the contractile structures, with the sarcolemm,
the cell membrane. It is thus important for the mechanical stability of the
muscle cells during muscle contraction.
Dystrophin network:
Dystrophin belongs to a network of many different proteins of which more than
50 are known. Among them are the dystro- and sarcoglycans, the synthrophins and
integrins, dystrobrevin, nitric ocide synthase, and other components such as
dysferlin, sarcospan, laminin, caveolin, telethonin, myotolin, agrin, neurexin,
desmuslin, syncoilin, fukutin, aquaporin, spectrin, collagen, calpain and others.
In the future, more components are expected to be identified
(Campbell, Iowa City).
When dystrophin is missing, the balance between the different parts of this
dystrophin complex is disturbed. Especially the dystroglycans, the sarcoglycans
and sarcospan are reduced or disappear completely. Every one of the proteins of
the complex has its own gene which also can be disturbed by mutations. This leads
to the presently known 13 different limbgirdle and 5 congenital muscular
dystrophies, as well as to at least 8 other neuromuscular diseases.
How big are molecules, DNA and dystrophin?
A lay person seldom has a correct idea of the sizes of molecular structures
with which scientists are working.
The following mental experiment demonstrates the smallness of a simple molecule.
Pour on quarter of a liter of wine at the straits of Gibraltar into the
Mediterranean. Then mix the Mediterranean well and, at the other end in
Alexandria, take out one quarter liter of water with the same wine glass.
How many alcohol molecules will you find in the wine glass? Twenty two million!
The DNA double helix has a diameter of two nanometers, millionths of
a millimeter. If one enlarges the helix to a diameter of one centimeter,
how tall would a person 1,80 meters tall be if one would enlarge him/her by
the same factor? Nine thousand kilometers, this is about the distance from
Europe to Florida.
Each cell nucleus of the about 100 trillion (100 x 1012) cells of
an adult human being contains the complete genetic material with 6 billion
base pairs. The entire DNA in all chromosomes of each single cell nucleus is
two meters long!
Every dystrophin protein is 125 nanometers long, thus 80,000 of then laid down
in a straight line would cover just one centimeter.
There are 114 billion dystrophin molecules and the same number of dystrophin
protein complexes in one gram of muscle.
Mutation and origin of the disease:
Duchenne muscular dystrophy is caused by three different kinds of mutations
of the dystrophin gene: deletions, if one or more of the exons of the gene
are missing, duplications, if parts are duplicated, and
point mutations, if single bases are exchanged, eliminated or added.
As the reading mechanism of the information in the ribosomes always reads
code words of three letters one after the other without spacings, a mutation
does not upset the reading frame if the number of letters missing or
added can be divided by three without a remainder. In this case, the dystrophin
made is longer or shorter. If this change only involves non-essential structures
of the dystrophin as e.g. the central part, it can still be partly functional.
Then, the benign form of dystrophy, Becker muscular dystrophy, develops.
If the mutation shifts the reading frame by one or two bases, then a whole string
of incorrect amino acids is incorporated into the protein starting at the
mutation site until finally a new and premature stop codon is reached which
terminates the synthesis. The incomplete dystrophin cannot fulfil its normal
function, it is degraded and Duchenne muscular dystrophy develops.
Without dystrophin, the muscle cells degenerate. They are continuously
regenerated, but the repair mechanism eventually fails. The destroyed muscle
fibers are replaced by fat and connective tissue leading to fibrosis and, at
the age of two to three years, to the first visible symptoms of the disease.
Where the motor nerves contact the muscle membrane, another protein with a
structure similar to dystrophin, utrophin, is located and contributes
to some extent to the stability of the muscle membrane (Davies, Oxford).
Without utrophin, the disease would progress much faster.
Genetics of Duchenne muscular dystrophy:
In addition to
the 44 normal chromosomes, the autosomes, boys have two different sex chromosomes
in the nucleus of every one of their body cells, one Y chromosome and one
single X chromosome. If the dystrophin gene on their X chromosome is damaged
by a mutation, it cannot be compensated for by an intact gene on a second X
chromosome, as it is possible for mutations on the autosomes, which are always
present in pairs. Therefore, Duchenne and Becker dystrophy affect
only boys.
Women, however, have two X chromosomes in their body cells. When they carry
a mutated dystrophin gene on one of their X chromosomes, they can transmit
the disease, they are genetic carriers. As one of the X chromosomes is
inactivated in a random fashion, about only half of their muscle cell nuclei
have an intact dystrophin gene. This is sufficient to cause either none or only
weak clinical symptoms of the disease.
About two thirds of Duchenne boys inherit the disease because their mother
is a genetic carrier. At the meiosis, the cell division leading
to the egg cells, each egg cell receives only one X chromosome. The probability
that it is the X chromosome with the gene mutation is 50 %. Therefore on average
50 % of her sons will have Duchenne muscular dystrophy and on average 50 % of
her daughters will also be carriers. These risks remain the same for
all children in a family, it is not smaller if the family already has a
son with Duchenne muscular dystrophy.
If the mother is a carrier, the mutation arose either in the germ cells of
her parents or in an earlier generation. As all body cells of a genetic
carrier have the mutated gene, her carriership can be detected by a gene
analysis in the leukocytes, the white blood cells, which contain chromosomes.
About one fourth of Duchenne boys have a new mutation. In these cases,
the mutation took place spontaneously in the particular egg cell of the
mother that then became the patient. As only one egg cell is affected, all
other children of these women do not face a greater risk than the
general risk for the disease.
About one tenth of Duchenne boys have a mother with a germ cell mosaic, because
the new mutation arose early in the germ cell formation and the mutated cell
developed into a group of egg cells each carrying the mutation. As more than
one egg cell is affected, another son can inherit the disease too, or a daughter
can be a genetic carrier.
As present genetic methods cannot detect a germ cell mosaic, a prenatal diagnosis
should be offered during a second pregnancy to all women who already have a boy
with Duchenne muscular dystrophy, not only to those who are proven genetic
carriers (Müller-Reible, Würzburg).
Clinical course of Duchenne muscular dystrophy:
The first
clinical signs appear at about two to three years of age causing difficulties
in walking and especially in climbing stairs. Without early detection, even
today the disease is generally diagnosed at about 3 to 5 years. Because of
increasing contractures at the foot, knee, and hip joints, the patients lose
their walking ability at 10 to 12 years. Increasing spine deformities, scoliosis,
and restrictions of movement make them soon completely dependent on intensive
care. The involvement of the respiratory and heart functions lead to death by
cardiac and circulatory insufficiency at an early adult age. Early orthopedic
operations to avoid contractures and spine deformities as well as respiratory
aids and other measures can improve the quality of life and significantly
prolong life expectancy.
Gene diagnostics
Genetic methods for the diagnosis
of Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy
in a boy, during a pregnancy at risk, and for the determination of carriership
in a woman.
Early detection in infancy.
Diagnosis of Duchenne muscular dystrophy in a boy:
For a gene analysis,
a blood sample with leukocytes is needed. These white blood cells, but not
the red ones, have cell nuclei which contain the hereditary material DNA.
The white cells are isolated and the DNA is obtained from them.
As about 60 % of Duchenne patients have deletions of one or more exons in
the their dystrophin gene, one looks first for these deletions which can
be everywhere in the gene but which are more numerous in some regions than
in others. Generally, in a first step, 19 selected exons of the 79 in the
dystrophin gene are multiplied, amplified. Normally, one does not amplify
all these 19 exons simultaneously, but by multiplex reactions in groups
of 4 to 6 exons.
This already allows the detection of 98 % of all deletions. In two thirds of
these cases, one can already deduce whether the reading frame is disturbed
or not and thus predict whether the patient has a Duchenne or a Becker dystrophy.
For the remaining third, more exons must be amplified.
The amplification is performed by the polymerase chain reaction, PCR,
which needs primers for each exon. The primers are short synthetic DNA
sequences which attach themselves to the beginning and the end of an exon
sequence. The small gene fragments obtained in this way are separated by
electrophoresis where they migrate different distances in a gel layer and then
can be made visible as bands like unevenly spaced rungs of a ladder. Each band
represents one of the 79 exons. A deletion is detected when one or more of these
bands are missing.
If no deletion is found, a point mutation is probable. To characterize it
unequivocally, the base sequences of most of the exons would have to be
determined. Such sequence determinations, however, are very demanding, and they
are not yet routinely offered. In these cases, a final diagnosis can only be
made by investigation of muscle tissue obtained by a biopsy. There, not the
dystrophin gene is analyzed, but the dystrophin protein in a
western blot.
In this method, after electrophoretic separation, the protein pattern is
transferred to another carrier material by blotting, where it is made
visible with antibodies. Or fluorescent antibodies are attached to the
dystrophin, which can then be detected under the microscope as a bright line
around the healthy muscle cells. In Duchenne dystrophy, it is not seen there
or only in traces, and in Becker dystrophy, these lines are often frayed,
interrupted and mostly much weaker than normal.
If a gene analysis gives an unequivocal result, a muscle biopsy is often no
longer necessary. Especially, small children could thus avoid this surgical
procedure. However, if a muscle biopsy is necessary, then it can also be
performed as a needle biopsy under local anesthesia.
Prenatal diagnosis:
For a prenatal
diagnosis of Duchenne dystrophy, there generally must be a definite reason
mostly because there already is or was a patient in the family. For a diagnosis
during early pregnancy, tissue of the unborn child must be obtained either
by a chorion villi biopsy in the 10th to 12th
pregnancy week or by an amniocentesis in the 13th to 16th week.
For a chorion villi biopsy, a small piece of the future placenta is aspirated
through a fine canula. If it is certain that cells of the child have been
obtained, the tissue can be used directly for the analysis. The risk that this
intervention terminates the pregnancy involuntarily is about 3 to 5 %.
The advantage of an amniocentesis is the lower abortion risk of below 1 %.
The disadvantage is that the few cells of the child in the amniotic fluid
must first be multiplied in the laboratory, and this can last up to 3 weeks,
therefore, the analysis cannot begin before the 15th to 18th week.
If sufficient cells of the child have been obtained, the chromosomes are
investigated first. This allows to determine the sex of the child. If it is
a girl, then, in most cases, no further tests are performed, because the
consequences of a Duchenne carriership should be discussed with the girl
when she is old enough to understand them and to make her own decisions.
If the unborn child is a boy, then a gene analysis if performed in most
cases with the same techniques as described for the diagnosis after birth.
Diagnosis of carriership:
If the mutation
of a Duchenne boy in the family is precisely known, one can specifically look
for the same mutation in the mother and in her female relatives. This is
technically more difficult than in Duchenne boys because only one of the
two X chromosomes of a woman could carry the mutation. If she is a carrier,
the intensity of the bands after electrophoresis are only reduced to half of
normal if one or more exons are deleted. However, the amplification of the
exons is not easy to control. And it is often difficult to detect reliably the
differences of the band intensities.
Therefore, one often uses polymorphic markers for the analysis. These
are DNA sequences in the introns between the exons which are almost always
differently arranged on an individual chromosome, and they also have different
lengths so that the two chromosomes can be distinguished. These marker sequences
have nothing to do with the disease, they are characteristic for each person,
and they can also be amplified by the PCR method and thus be identified
unequivocally after electrophoresis.
If a boy has a deletion in the dystrophin gene, not only are one or more exons
missing but also the markers in the introns between them. In a woman, one can
check whether these markers are also missing on one of her X chromosomes. If
the markers are missing which her son also does not have, then it is highly
probable that she has the same deletion as he on one of her X chromosomes.
She is thus a genetic carrier. If she is not a carrier, she should have
additional markers in this region.
The DNA markers can also be used if the patient in the family does not have
a deletion. Then one does not know what the mutation looks like. But based
on the arrangement of the markers, one can say on which of the two X chromosomes
of the mother the mutated gene is located which her sick son has inherited from
her. And every woman in the family who has the same X chromosome has a high risk
being a carrier.
This indirect method has been used for about 20 years, one now knows, however,
many more markers. Therefore, one can almost always distinguish the two
X chromosomes of a woman from each other, and it hardly ever happens any more
that a family is not informative.
If, however, all these methods are not successful, then, in some cases, one
can mark certain gene regions on the X chromosome with fluorescent gene probes
and then check under the microscope whether light points are present or missing
signifying normal or deleted gene regions. But this FISH method - fluorescence
in situ hybridization - can only be used if certain specific deletions have
happened in the family.
Sequence analysis of the dystrophin gene as routine test:
With the new
analytic technique SCAIP (single condition amplification/internal primer)
it will in the future be possible to analyze reliably within three days
point mutations, small deletions, as well as all other mutations in a routine
fashion. In this method, all exons of the dystrophin gene, all intron-exon border
regions with the splice signals, and all promoters are completely sequenced.
All these gene regions, together about 110,000 base pairs long, are amplified
with their special primers in one single PCR reaction and then checked in a micro
electrophoresis. This allows the determination of all exon and promoter
deletions, also those which are not found with the other methods. The base
sequence of each gene fragment is then determined automatically with individual
sequencing primers to detect the point mutations.
As this method also detects all mutations of Duchenne carriers, it will lead
to an improvement of genetic counselling. Data files are now compiled which
will allow the prediction of the clinical course of a Duchenne or Becker muscular
dystrophy based on a defined deletion, duplication or point mutation. For
this purpose, many patients will have to be investigated clinically and
genetically (Flanigan, Salt Lake City).
Early detection at infant age
(without gene technique):
In Germany, 4
weeks to 1 year old infant boys with Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy,
which do not yet have clinical symptoms, are detected in a voluntary
CK screening program in which the enzyme creatine kinase, CK, is
determined in a dry blood spot. From 1974 until July 2003, more than 500,000
infant boys have been tested. Among them, 178 boys with strongly elevated CK
activities were found, for 136 of them, a Duchenne muscular dystrophy (1:3,700)
was diagnosed or made probable, and 28 had a Becker muscular dystrophy
(1:17,800).
The early detection allows the parents to make in time the decisions which
are the correct ones for them, so that no other child with the same disease
is born in the same family or in maternally related families. In addition,
the diagnostic odyssey can be avoided which still often takes many years
until an expert for muscle diseases is found. Such programs will be necessary
in the future, because the progress in therapeutic research will lead to studies
with very young patients who have no clinical symptoms and whose muscles are
still largely intact (Scheuerbrandt, Breitnau/Freiburg).
Therapeutic possibilities:
Research strategies for a
causal therapy.
There is still no therapy for Duchenne muscular dystrophy.
To cure
Duchenne muscular dystrophy, the consequences of the mutation of the dystrophin
gene, the muscle degeneration, have to be stopped or at least alleviated.
Research tries to do this either by gene therapy or by drug therapy.
Gene therapy means that either all exons of the intact dystrophin gene,
its cDNA, or parts of it, are introduced into each muscle cell,
or that the damaged gene is repaired by genetic techniques. A drug therapy
would mean that a new or already known drug is given to block or to slow down
the muscle degeneration without influencing the gene itself. On both approaches,
important progress has been made during the last few years.
There is no therapy yet:
In spite of
this progress, neither a gene nor a drug therapy has been developed so far
which would cure the disease of Duchenne boys. Only three closely related
drugs, prednisone, prednisolone, and deflazacort, have been found
which, during a limited time, can slow down the degeneration of the muscles.
Because of the severity of the disease, the patients, their families, their
doctors, and the public in general are looking desperately for even the smallest
positive research result. And the media, mainly newspapers and television, even
the responsible among them, tend to exaggerate small advances as important
breakthroughs. But also the scientists themselves are often over-optimistic
when they declare the results of their experiments with animals as therapeutic
victories, thus raising false hopes. Not a single Duchenne boy has ever been
cured.
Transfer of a new dystrophin gene
The exons of the entire or the shortened dystrophin gene
can be transferred into muscle cells by viruses, plasmids, or myoblasts.
Immune reactions must be avoided.
It is reasonable to believe that the transfer, the transportation, of
sufficient quantities of the intact dystrophin gene into the nuclei of
dystrophic muscle cells would cure the disease if the genetic information of
the new genes is used by the protein synthesizing ribosomes of the cell to
produce sufficiently large quantities of functional dystrophin which then
migrates to its normal place under the cell membrane where it is correctly
incorporated into the intricate dystrophin-glycoprotein complex of the
costameres.
The dystrophic mouse:
Most of the
experiments with this aim have been performed with one kind of laboratory animal,
the dystrophic mdx mouse, which has a point mutation at base pair 3,185
in exon 23 of its dystrophin gene. This mutation has changed a CAA codon, which
signifies the amino acid glutamine, to a TAA codon, which is a stop sign, so
that the synthesis of dystrophin is interrupted prematurely. Thus, the mouse
has no functional dystrophin in its muscles. However, these mice do not lose
their muscles because they do not develop fibrosis, a proliferation of
connective tissue, like Duchenne boys do, so that the degeneration caused by
the disease does not overtake the regeneration.
Although gene transfer can be studied with them, one should keep in mind that
any results obtained with these mice cannot be regarded as immediately
applicable to children as long as they are not confirmed by clinical studies
with Duchenne patients. A child is not a big mouse!
The dystrophic dog:
Some experiments
are performed with dystrophic dogs, the golden retriever muscular dystrophy
(GRMD) dogs which, in contrast to the mice, have a muscular dystrophy similar
to the dystrophy of Duchenne boys. They are really handicapped and hard to raise
and to manage. Their dystrophin gene has a point mutation in the splice receptor
site of intron 6 which leads to the deletion of exon 7 in the mRNA, to a frame
shift, and a premature stop codon.
Gene transfer with adeno viruses:
In order to
transfer a gene, a transporter, a gene vector, is needed. One way to
transfer genetic material into living cells is to pack it into viruses, which
consist of a string of their own genes enveloped in a protein shell. They attach
themselves to special receptor proteins on the surface of a cell, inject their
genes through the cell membrane and then use the synthesizing apparatus of the
infected cell to reproduce themselves.
Mainly two kinds of viruses are used as gene vectors in Duchenne research,
the adeno virus and the ten times smaller adeno-associated virus.
The vectors derived from them cannot be further multiplied inside the target cell
because almost all of their own genes have been eliminated. The most advantageous
vector seems to be the gutted, practically empty adenovirus, which does
not contain any genes of its own, and thus has room for up to 36,000 foreign
genetic letters, sufficient for the entire cDNA, i.e., all exons with the
information for the complete dystrophin protein and for additional control
sequences. With these gutted viruses new dystrophin was produced in up to 30 %
of the muscle fibers of a dystrophic mouse followed by an improvement of muscle
function in young as well as in older mice
(Lochmüller, Munich; Chamberlain, Seattle).
Two genes in one virus:
In new
experiments two mouse dystrophin cDNAs were packed into each gutted
virus, that means, two times all 79 exons without the introns, and in addition
two more gene sequences, the very strong enhancer of the cytomegalovirus and the
beta-actin promoter. These gene vectors were injected into the tibialis anterior
muscle of newborn mdx mice and into 4-6 weeks old juvenile mice. After 30 days,
42 % of the cells in the treated muscle of the newborn mice had new dystrophin
which was still detectable after half a year. In the juvenile mice, 24 % of the
muscle cells had new dystrophin after 30 days, which, however, was reduced to
half the amount after 6 months. Only the juvenile mice showed small immune
problems. At present, these new vector constructions are the most effective
ones for the treatment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy by gene therapy
(Karpati, Montreal).
Gene transfer with adeno-associated viruses:
These small
viruses can only transport genetic material that is not longer than about
5,000 base pairs, about one third of the entire dystrophin cDNA. Their advantage
is that they transfer the gene more effectively than the normal adenoviruses.
The disadvantage is that the dystrophin cDNA to be transferred has to be
shortened considerably to fit into this small vector. Patients with Becker
muscular dystrophy, that progresses much slower than Duchenne dystrophy, mostly
have such shortened dystrophin in their muscles. Therefore, a transfer of one of
these Becker mini genes would not completely cure Duchenne muscular
dystrophy but only transform it into the benign Becker form.
In order to determine which of the four regions of the normal dystrophin
protein - the two end regions, the cystein-rich, or the central rod
regions - are important and which are not, extensive experiments were performed
with dystrophic mice which were genetically modified so that they had one of
nine different shortened dystrophins in their muscles.
It had already been known that some of the rodlike central region can be
removed without loss of function. The detailed analysis of the three-dimensional
structure revealed now which particular parts of the rod structure could be
deleted without significantly losing the muscle protecting function. One of the
shortened dystrophins, which was about half as long as the normal one, had
practically the same properties as the unaltered protein. Delivery of the genes
of this and some of the other shortened dystrophins with adeno associated viruses
into the muscles of the mdx mice prevented and partially reversed the dystrophic
symptoms. These results demonstrated that specific modifications of the
dystrophin gene can generate novel proteins that are significantly smaller but
more functional than the naturally shortened dystrophins of patients with Becker
muscular dystrophy (Chamberlain, Seattle).
If about 30 % of the normal amount of unchanged dystrophin re-appears,
measurements on the diaphragm of the mice indicated that the muscle function
also improved. The transfer of the mini gene also led to an improvement of
muscle function. In addition, the gene transfer showed better results in younger
animals, because there were fewer problems of immune rejection, and, after a
single injection, the newly synthesized dystrophin remained in the muscles
longer than in adult animals. After a single treatment of newborn mice, newly
formed dystrophin could still be found after one year.
For a future application in humans, this means that the patients would have
to be treated as soon as possible after birth when their muscles are still
largely intact (Clemens, Pittsburgh).
Gene transfer via the blood stream:
In the
experiments so far described, solutions of the viruses that contain the
dystrophin gene were injected directly into the muscles. In order to reach
all muscles, also those of the heart and the lungs, experiments are being
performed to develop a systemic treatment, i.e. the injection of the
viruses into the blood stream. To ensure that the new dystrophin is only
synthesized in muscle cells, another genetic sequence had to be added to the
dystrophin gene in the virus, the CK promoter, which normally activates
the gene of the muscle protein creatine kinase. This promoter would assure that
the new dystrophin gene is activated only in muscle cells and not elsewhere.
To investigate whether such strategies would function in a living animal,
transgenic mdx mice were created which have an additional gene
construction inserted in their chromosomes. This consisted of an often used
Becker gene which, with 6,300 base pairs, is only half as long as the normal
gene, and which was preceded by a CK promoter of 1,354 base pairs. Shortened
dystrophin was then present during the entire life time of the mice of up to
24 months in sufficient quantities to improve all measurable clinical
symptoms.
The new protein appeared only in the muscles of the transgenic mice,
significantly more in the fast muscles than in the slow muscles. The
fast muscles, which can work immediately but not consistently, obtain their
energy through glycolysis, through the fast degradation of glucose without the
use of oxygen. The energy for the slow and consistently working muscles is
provided by the enzymes of the respiratory chain, the slow "burning"
of organic substances with oxygen. As the fast muscles are destroyed first by
the muscular dystrophy, the predominant appearance of new dystrophin in these
fast muscles is able to ameliorate just this early consequence of the disease.
Experiments have also shown that as few as 20 to 30 % of the normal quantity of
dystrophin have a significant therapeutic effect.
For these experiments with transgenic mice, the Becker dystrophin gene
together with the CK promoter was introduced into the germ cells by artificial
insemination and genetic manipulation, so that it was inherited to the progeny
of the mice. This is a technique which obviously cannot be performed with humans.
To cure the sick children, one would have to transport the gene with its promoter
by gene transfer with a vector soon after birth, if possible, into
all muscles (Lochmüller, Munich).
Amplification of targeted gene transfer:
The viruses
attach themselves to specific structures on the cell membrane, to the coxsackie
and adenovirus receptors, from where they penetrate the muscle cell
through the membrane. These receptors, however, are more numerous on developing
and regenerating muscle cells. They are downregulated, less numerous, on mature
muscle cells which no longer divide. Therefore, gene transfer with adenovirus
vectors is more efficient in dividing muscle cells.
To overcome this handicap, transgenic mice were produced which expressed
these receptors in large amounts on the surface of mature muscle fibers.
This led to an up to 10 times more efficient transfer of the dystrophin gene
(Holland, Montreal; Lochmüller, Munich).
As a multiplication of the of the virus receptors on the muscle cells of a
patient could only be achieved by additional gene technical methods with all
their risks, helper proteins were produced. In this case, they were monoclonal
antibodies which consisted of only one kind of molecule that could bind with
one end highly specifically on other, more numerous receptors. With their other
end, these immune proteins could bind to modified coat proteins of the adeno
viruses. To achieve this binding, additional genetic information for a chain
of 33 amino acids from a bacterium was introduced into the adeno viruses by
genetic manipulation.
These adeno viruses could now attach themselves via the antibody bridge to
integrin and nerve receptors (NCAM) which were much more numerous than the
adeno receptors. This method allowed up to 77 times more adeno viruses to pass
through the membrane into the muscle cell than before. With this new technique,
which can also be used against other diseases, only the gene was transported
which produces the easily detectable protein beta-galactosidase. Experiments to
transfer the dystrophin gene are being prepared (Kochanek, Cologne).
Transfer of naked genes:
For this
technique, the genetic material DNA to be transferred is not built into
viruses but into plasmids, small circular DNA structures without protein, that
exist in bacteria where they mostly give rise to resistance against antibiotics.
The advantage of this kind of gene transfer is that the plasmids do not contain
any protein, only genetic material, naked DNA, so that no immune reaction
develops against the vector material.
Experiments were made with plasmids containing marker or reporter genes for
proteins that can be detected in the muscle tissue after staining or by light
production so that the success of a transfer experiment can easily be
monitored.
When relatively large volumes of a solution of these plasmids were
injected under pressure into the arteries of the limbs of rats and
rhesus monkeys, the reporter genes beta-galactosidase and luciferase were
transferred into up to 20 % of the muscle fibers after one single injection
and into up to 40 % after repeated injections. The pressure was created by
blocking the venous outflow from the limb for a short time. Experiments to
transfer the dystrophin gene are currently being performed in mdx mice, monkeys,
and GRMD dogs (Wolff, Madison; Braun, Strasbourg). In France,
clinical studies with Duchenne boys have been started which are described in
the section "Clinical studies".
Experiments to overcome immunological problems:
As plasmids
contain only DNA but not any proteins, gene transfer with such naked DNA allows
the examination of potential problems with immune responses to newly created
dystrophin without the interference of other proteins which are newly produced
with the other methods of gene transfer using viral and cell vectors.
If the human dystrophin gene is introduced into the muscles of mdx mice, an
immune response develops against the foreign dystrophin. This does not happen
after the transfer of the dystrophin gene of mice, although normal dystrophin
is not present in the muscles of these dystrophic mice. The lack of an
immune response to mouse dystrophin may be due to the presence of the other
forms of dystrophin. These results suggest that immune responses to dystrophin
gene transfer may not be a particular problem in Duchenne patients, especially
in those with point mutations that do not interfere with the synthesis of the
other forms of dystrophin. Current experimental work is focussed on determining
which of the other dystrophins must be present to allow immune tolerance to the
appearance of new muscle type dystrophin after gene transfer
(Wells, London).
Experiments with stem cells
Among the
satellite cells and the myoblasts of the muscles,
and also among the cells of the skin and the blood vessels,
are stem cells which can form new muscles or regenerate them.
Stem cells
exist in many body tissues, e.g., also in skeletal muscles and in bone marrow.
They are non-specialized cells that can develop into some kinds of specialized
cells, e.g. bone marrow stem cells into different types of blood cells and muscle
stem cells into new muscle cells. These pluripotent cells are somatic or
adult stem cells in contrast to embryonic stem cells which are
totipotent and thus can develop into all kinds of body and germ
cells. Stem cell research to find a therapy for Duchenne dystrophy uses with one
exception only adult stem cells of experimental animals. Thus the ethical
problems connected with the use of human embryonic stem cells can probably be
avoided.
Stem cells from skeletal muscles:
On the surface
of the muscle cells are satellite cells, also called myogenic cells or
myoblasts which, after an activation through several intermediate steps,
can form new muscles or repair injured muscles. To determine whether such
"back-up" cells are entirely or partly stem cells, satellite cells
from the skeletal muscles of newborn mice were isolated. It was found that they
consist of three different kinds, mainly the so-called EP and LP myogenic cells,
which are already quite specialized. The third kind are muscle derived stem
cells, MDSC. They are very rare, only one among 100,000 satellite cells is
one such MDS cell. But these rare cells are pluripotent, that is, they
can develop into muscle cells as well as into cells of the nerves and of the
blood vessels for new muscles. And they can be cultured for a long time.
These MDS cells were multiplied in the laboratory, and then
400,000 of them in 25 microliters (a fortieth of a cubic centimeter) of liquid
injected in one single portion into one muscle of living mdx mice. In order to
see in what way these cells are different from the normal myogenic cells, the
more specialized EP cells were also injected into mdx mice under the same
conditions.
In the mice which were treated with the EP cells, 130 muscle
cells at the injection site contained new dystrophin after 30 days,
which however, after 90 days, had largely disappeared. In these mice,
immune rejection by lymphocites was observed which was probably responsible
for the slow disappearance of the new dystrophin.
In contrast to these results, 1,500 muscle cells at the
injection site of the mice treated with MDS cells contained new dystrophin,
about 10 times as many as after the injection of EP cells. Even after 90 days,
in practically all of these cells, the new dystrophin was still present.
In this case, there was no immune rejection although the receptor
mice had not received any immune suppressive drugs.
As the muscle stem cells used in these experiments were isolated
from newborn normal mice, this technique will probably not be applicable
without modification with Duchenne children. They could, however, influence the
recently resumed myoblast studies (Huard, Pittsburgh; Wernig, Bonn).
Stem cells from bone marrow, muscles and skin:
At the end of
the last decade, the first experiments with stem cells from bone marrow and
with muscle satellite cells were performed. In all experiments, the stem cells
were obtained from normal male mice with normal dystrophin genes and then
injected into the tail vein of female mdx mice. The female mice were homozygous,
that is, the dystrophin genes on both of their X chromosomes were mutated
so that they could not produce any own dystrophin. The fate of the injected cells
in the female mice could be followed by the detection of the male Y chromosome.
The female mice had to be lethally irradiated with X rays to avoid an immune
reaction. The transfer of the stem cells regenerated the bone marrow of the
mice.
First, 10 to 50 million cells from the untreated bone marrow were injected.
Three months later, dystrophin could be detected in up to 10 % of the muscle
cells of the mice. Some of the dystrophin-positive cells contained Y chromosomes
as proof that the bone marrow cells from the normal male mice came via the blood
stream and had fused with the muscle cells of the mdx mice. They had brought with
them the information for the normal dystrophin which was then used for the
production of functional dystrophin. It was important to prove that the new
dystrophin did not appear by reversion, that is, by spontaneous exon skipping
which occurs to a small extent in mdx mice and also in Duchenne boys.
To find out which part of the bone marrow cells has the stem
cell properties, a small side population, SP, could be separated from the
original cell mixture by the FACS method, fluorescence-activated cell
sorting. As these SP cells had stem cell properties, they were used for
further experiments.
Three months after the injection of only 2,000 to 5,000 of
these SP bone marrow cells, up to 4 % of the muscle cells of the mdx mice had
functional dystrophin. In a similar way, SP muscle stem cells were isolated
from muscle satellite cells, and 7,000 to 20,000 of them were injected into the
blood stream of female mdx mice. After one month, 5 to 9 % of their muscle cells
contained normal dystrophin and some also had Y chromosomes.
Now, in 2002/2003, these experiments were repeated and extended
to stem cells which were obtained from skin. The advantages of an isolation
from skin are that this tissue is more easily accessible than muscle tissue,
and that the acceptor animals no longer have to be irradiated.
A small side population of cells was also obtained with the FACS technique from
skin cells which had the same surface properties, markers, as the SP muscle
stem cells. The percentages of SP cells were now 0.1 % from bone marrow cells,
0.7 % from muscle cells, and 1.2 % from skin cells. Three months after the
injection of 6.000 to 50.000 of the SP skin cells, 2.3 % of the muscle cells of
the female mice contained new dystrophin and also some Y chromosomes.
This experiment had proved that stem cells can be isolated
from skin, and that, after application via the blood stream, they can form
new muscle cells with normal dystrophin. This technique is not yet sufficiently
effective to be of therapeutic significance. But after optimization, a Duchenne
therapy might possibly be based on it (Kunkel, Boston).
Activation of muscle stem cells:
Stem cells with specific
surface structures which are located in intact muscles, did not develop
into new muscle cells, they were not myogenic. But if the muscles were
injured and the muscle cells regenerated themselves, then the number of muscle
stem cells increased up to ten times. These cells were now myogenic, they
developed into myoblasts and new muscle cells, as experiments with cell cultures
and mice have shown. This activation was initiated by Wnt proteins, a family of
signal proteins which apparently are produced by injured muscle cells and which
also play a role during embryonic development (Rudnicki, Ottawa).
Some Wnt proteins have been isolated and characterized now.
They are about 400 amino acids long and contain palmitic acid, a fatty acid which
seems to be important for the transmittance of molecular signals (Nusse,
Stanford).
Mesoangioblasts, stem cells from blood vessels:
One half million of newly detected stem cells from blood
vessels of fetal normal mice were delivered by one single injection into the
artery of one hind leg of mice. These mice were missing one protein of the
dystrophin complex, the alpha sarcoglycan which causes one of the many
limb-girdle muscular dystrophies in humans. The injected cells migrated into
the blood capillaries, passed through their cell walls, and from there into all
muscles of the injected leg, especially into regenerating fibers.
For at least three months after the injection, new sarcoglycan
was again present in almost normal quantities. The same was true for many of
the other proteins of the dystrophin complexes which had also been missing. Also,
there were no immune reactions. After three consecutive injections every 40
days, not only was the gene defect almost completely corrected, but also the
muscle force in the treated leg was practically normalized again. Here as well,
no immune problems were encountered.
In order to check whether this technique could possibly be
used for a gene therapy, the mesoangioblasts from "sick" mice were
isolated, and then the missing gene for alpha sarcoglycan was transferred with
retroviruses into these defective stem cells. The systemic application of these
ex-vivo treated cells led to the same positive results as found with the normal
cells. However, retroviruses which insert themselves with the transported
therapeutic gene into the chromosomes, should not be used in humans because
of their risk of causing cancer.
For these experiments, the blood-vessel derived stem cells
were isolated from unborn mice. But if it were also possible to isolate them
from boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy, these unexpected positive results
would mean that a number of problems connected with the present gene transfer
experiments could be avoided as, e.g., low effectivity, immune rejection, and
the requirement of many injections into all muscles which can be reached.
Intact dystrophin genes would have to be transferred into
these patient-derived cells by an ex-vivo procedure with the known vectors,
then multiplied in the laboratory, and finally re-injected into the most
important arteries of the child. Possibly, the treatment would have to be
repeated after several months, therefore it is important that these cells
are not rejected by the immune system. And one of the most important advantages
would be that, with this technique, all muscles could be reached, also the
cardiac and respiratory muscles. It would be a systemic treatment with
relatively few injections compared to other gene therapy approaches
(Cossu, Milano).
A stem cell experiment of nature:
At the age of one year, a Duchenne boy had received a bone
marrow transplantation from his father because of another disease. As he could
still walk at 14 years in spite of the reading-frame-shifting deletion of exon
45, it was assumed that stem cells from the bone marrow had provided the
information for new dystrophin. Investigation of new bioptic material, however,
have now shown that the milder symptoms of the disease are due only to a small
extent to the transplant, but mainly to a spontaneous additional deletion of
exon 44, so that, in the mRNA, exon 46 follows directly after exon 43. This
exon skipping normalizes the reading frame. Dystrophin can again be produced
but is shorter and therefore causes the symptoms of a Becker dystrophy
(see paragraph on exon skipping). Apparently, after 13 years, a bone marrow
transplantation can contribute to some extent to a Duchenne therapy, however
not sufficiently so to significantly change the disease
(Kunkel, Boston).
Cell therapy with myoblasts:
Muscles have
their own stem cells, the satellite cells or myoblasts, which, during the
development or repair of muscles, fuse together to form myotubes and then
long muscle fibers. As the word "myoblast transfer" has been misused,
one now often prefers to say myogenic cells instead of myoblasts.
In the years 1990 and 1991, extensive clinical studies with Duchenne boys were
performed with myoblasts. This myoblast transfer technique had shown
positive results in mdx-mice. The cells used contained the normal dystrophin
gene because they were derived from a healthy donor, mostly from the father of
the patient. They were applied in multiple injections at 0.5 centimeters distance into
some muscles of Duchenne boys with the expectation that muscle cells with normal
dystrophin would form. However, these experiments were not successful, because
the transplanted cells did not migrate sufficiently inside the muscle, because
there were immunological problems, and because almost all of the injected
myogenic cells had died after a short time
(Karpati, Montreal, and others).
New experiments to transplant myoblasts:
But work on
this technique continues in order to determine the reason why far less than
1 % of the transplanted myoblasts survived in the dystrophic muscles. Researchers
are now trying to characterize these rare active cells and to find out how
they can be isolated from the inactive cells. They are therefore looking for
molecular signals, special substances in the muscle cells, which could activate
the myoblasts (Partridge, London).
In earlier experiments, only two known drugs, cyclosporin A
and cyclophosphamide were used to suppress the immune reactions in Duchenne
patients. Now, other substances have been investigated in studies with monkeys.
This has shown that the immune inhibitor FK506 alone or in combination with the
inhibitor MMF avoids the rejection problems much better for several months.
A greater application density with injection distances of only 1 millimeter
and a higher number of transplanted cells contributed to the fact that in
monkeys, up to 67 % of the muscle cells had taken up the myoblasts,
they became hybrid muscle cells (Tremblay, Québec City).
A clinical study with the modified technique has been started in Canada
(see section "Clinical trials). Also in other laboratories, work is
being done to improve this cell therapy technique. E.g., it was found that
m144, a protein of the immune system, avoids the immediate death of the
myoblasts after transplantation into mouse muscles (Hodgetts, Crawley,
Australia).
Experiments for an ex-vivo gene therapy:
To avoid immune
problems completely, experiments were performed to isolate the myoblasts from
the patient himself and then, in cell culture, to transfer an intact dystrophin
gene into the cells, before they are re-injected again. In preliminary
experiments an electroperforation technique was used to transfer the
gene for a fluorescent marker protein into myoblasts in cell culture. This
technique transiently permeabilized the membranes with a single electrical
pulse, at e.g. 400 volts across a distance of 4 mm. Under optimal conditions,
the marker gene could be transferred into up to 70 % of the myoblasts where
it produced the fluorescent protein. The cells maintained their ability to
fuse into myotubes, the next stage of muscle development
(Bernheim, Geneva).
Changing the genetic information (gene repair)
Mutations of the dystrophin gene on the X chromosome are
repaired with oligoribonucleotides.
Entire exons are skipped in order to restore the reading frame.
Premature stop codons can possibly be skipped.
Experiments
are performed with the aim not to introduce a functional dystrophin gene sequence
into muscle cells, but to change the faulty genetic information, thus
repairing the mutation. Such a technique would have four important
advantages: (1) The risks of a virus-mediated gene transfer would be avoided,
(2) not only the dystrophin of the skeletal muscles, but all other forms of
dystrophin would also be repaired, (3) the tissue-specific regulation of the
dystrophin production would be maintained, and (4), manufacturing the therapeutic
agents, oligonucleotides, would probably be much easier and cheaper
than making virus or plasmid vectors with the genetic material to be
transported.
Oligonucleotides are short specific DNA or RNA sequences,
which consist of a few bases connected to each other by ribose- or
desoxyribose-phosphate bridges of the nucleic acid backbones. They can be
manufactured automatically.
Three kinds of repair strategies are already being
applied: (1) repairing the mutation on the level of the gene itself,
(2) changing the genetic information during the splicing process of the
pre-mRNA by exon skipping, and (3) ignoring a premature stop codon.
Repairing the gene in the GRMD dog:
Attempts to
repair point mutations at the gene level are made by using short
chimeric oligonucleotides, which contain RNA on one strand
and DNA on the other. The DNA strand of the chimeric oligonucleotide is perfectly
complementary to the correct gene sequence at the point mutation site of
the gene, while the RNA portion is perfectly complementary to the mutant
sequence. This leads to paired quadruplex structures, fourfold strands,
which are capable of correcting such a small mutation by activating the
biological DNA repair mechanisms of the cell.
With this technique, a DNA and RNA oligonucleotide
complementary to the splice-site mutation in the dystrophin gene of the
dystrophic GRMD dog was injected into a 6-week old affected dog. The treated
muscle showed: (1) evidence of restoration of the exon which was missing
because of the mutation, (2) restoration of the protein region encoded by the
missing exon within the full-length dystrophin protein which was found localized
correctly to the muscle membrane, and (3), most importantly, demonstration that
the gene on the X chromosome was corrected. The repair of the mutation was
sustained for almost a year in this dog (Bartlett, Bethesda).
Gene repair in the mdx mouse:
In a similar
experiment, the point mutation in exon 23 of myoblasts from mdx mice was
repaired in-vitro, and these myoblasts then fused to myotubes which produced
normal full-length dystrophin. Two weeks after one single injection of the
oligonucleotides into the muscles of mdx mice, up to 2 % of the fibers around
the injection site contained new dystrophin which was not revertant dystrophin,
i.e. normal dystrophin after a spontaneous suppression of the mutation. This
amount of new dystrophin remained stable for at least 10 weeks
(Rando, Palo Alto).
Exon skipping:
With this
technique one tries to change a Duchenne mutation into a Becker mutation.
This can be done by inducing the splicing mechanism, which cuts out the introns
from the pre-messenger RNA, to also eliminate one specific exon after a
point mutation or a deletion had shifted the reading frame and thus caused a
premature stop codon. The aim of this approach is to restore the disturbed
reading frame.
The gene with its mutation is not altered by exon skipping, but the
messenger RNA, mRNA, no longer contains the information of the skipped exon.
As the mRNA is shorter than normal, the dystrophin protein is also shorter, it
contains fewer amino acids. If the missing amino acids are part of the central
region of the dystrophin, they are often not essential, and the resulting
shorter protein can still perform its stabilizing role of the muscle cell
membrane. The result would be the change of the severe Duchenne symptoms into
the much milder symptoms of Becker muscular dystrophy.
Elimination of the mutation of the mdx mouse:
This strategy
was used to by-pass the single base-pair defect, the point mutation in exon 23
of the mdx mouse. An antisense oligoribonucleotide, consisting of 20
base pairs which were complementary to the RNA sequence of the pre-mRNA at
the border region of exon 23 to intron 23, induced the splicing process to
disregard the exon containing the mutation. The genetic information of exon 23,
which codes for 71 amino acids in the rod domain, was thus skipped during
the reading process.
This and the other investigated antisense-oligoribonucleotides
were chemically modified, e.g., by protecting the normally free and sensitive
OH-groups of the ribose units of the RNA by methyl groups (-CH3).
About 5 micrograms (millionths of a gram) of these stabilized potential
"gene drugs" were injected together with the detergent F127 into
the leg muscles of living mdx mice. After two to four weeks, up to 20 % of the
muscle fibers contained almost the normal amount of slightly shortened
dystrophin. And, together with the other components of the dystrophin complex,
it was located correctly on the cell membrane. The muscle force was significantly
improved but not completely normalized. A repeated treatment increased the
number of dystrophin-positive muscle fibers without the development of an
immune rejection (Wilton, Perth, Partridge, London).
Exon skipping in the mRNA of the human dystrophin:
Exon 45 of the
dystrophin gene is the single most frequently deleted exon in boys with
Duchenne dystrophy. This causes a frame shift in the mRNA and a premature
stop codon leading to a truncated and non-functional dystrophin protein which
is subsequently degraded in the muscle cells. However, if both exons 45 and 46
are missing simultaneously, the reading frame is not disturbed, not
shifted, resulting in a shorter than normal dystrophin with 108 non-essential
amino acids from the middle part of the protein missing. Patients with this
specific deletion have the milder symptoms of Becker muscular dystrophy.
In-vitro experiments to specifically delete exon 46 from
the dystrophin pre-mRNA in myotubes from mdx mice were successfully performed
with four different antisense oligoribonucleotides complementary to a splicing
regulatory sequence within exon 46. With these oligonucleotides,
an exon recognition sequence (ERS) or an exonic splice enhancer (ESE) is blocked,
structures which are necessary for the splicing process, the joining of the
exons in the mRNA.
Then, similar in-vitro experiments were performed with several
antisense oligonucleotides specific to the analogous splice sites of the
human exon 46. With one of them, consisting of 19 base pairs, it was
possible to delete exon 46 from about 15 % of the dystrophin pre-mRNA in myotubes
obtained from two Duchenne patients who had a deletion of exon 45.
(The last page of this report shows the molecular details of this experiment.)
This percentage of shortened mRNA without exons 45 and 46
led to normal quantities of a shortened dystrophin in at least 75 % of the
myotubes. After 16 hours, this new dystrophin could be detected in the cells,
after 48 hours it had moved to the cell membrane and stayed there for at least
one week. The re-appearance of the dystrophin also led to the restoration of the
dystrophin complex in and under the muscle cell membrane. In the meantime, the
reading frame could be corrected in in-vitro muscle preparations from six other
patients who had different deletions and also a point mutation.
This technique is very specific, resulting only in the removal
of the one targeted exon. With the same technique, it was possible to skip18
other exons in muscle cell cultures. Thus, this very promising strategy,
proven in test-tube experiments, may possibly later convert the Duchenne
mutations into Becker mutations of more than 65 % of patients with deletions.
Ongoing studies investigate different methods for the transfer
of the of the antisense oligoribonucleotides into a living organism. To this
end, experiments with living mice are performed which, instead of their own
dystrophin gene, have the human gene in their muscles which, in addition, has
been changed by creating "human" deletions. Clinical trials on
Duchenne boys with these methods can only be contemplated after these studies
with "humanized" mice have given positive results.
As the structure of the dystrophin gene is known in all
details, it is already possible to predict which exon would have to be
skipped in order to restore the reading frame after a defined deletion or
point mutation. At this time, such predictions can only be purely theoretical.
It is not certain, whether the results obtained in cell culture or with mice,
will be the same in Duchenne boys, and it is not certain either, whether, in
an individual case, the restored but shortened dystrophin will really lead to
the symptoms of a Becker muscular dystrophy
(van Ommen, van Deutekom, Leiden).
Splice sites are specific RNA sequences at the borders
of exons and introns which are essential for the correct removal of the
non-coding intron sequences from the pre-mRNA. This pre-messenger RNA is
the first product of an active gene. After removal of the intron sequences by
splicing, it becomes messenger RNA, mRNA, that moves to the ribosomes where it
acts as the information transmitter for protein synthesis.
Exon skipping with internally produced oligonucleotides:
For a new
method of skipping exons, the antisense oligoribonucleotides do not have to
be injected but are synthesized in the cell nucleus, where they are needed,
after transfer of their gene. The intron sequences are cut out from the
pre-mRNA in the cell nucleus by spliceosomes. They are complex structures
consisting of several proteins and small RNAs, small nuclear = snRNAs, which
recognize the exon-intron borders and which join the exons after splicing
precisely and without shifting the reading frame.
Some of these very short RNAs are the U7-snRNAs. They bind
to splice sites at special recognition sequences in the pre-mRNA, block
the splicing of specific exons, and thus ensure that several proteins of
different length are produced by one gene. The U7-snRNAs normally regulate
the splicing processes of the mRNA of histones. Histones are proteins necessary
for packaging the DNA in the chromosomes.
For this new method, the U7-snRNAs were genetically modified
so that they no longer bound to the histone pre-mRNA but only to the splice
sites in the region of exon 23 of the pre-mRNA of the mouse dystrophin. To
achieve this, a gene coding for the modified U7-snRNA together with a creatine
kinase enhancer was packed into plasmids as vectors and then, in a laboratory
experiment, transferred into isolated myoblasts of the mouse. These cells then
developed in the culture dish into muscle cells.
In the nuclei of the transgenic myoblasts, the transferred
gene produced modified U7-snRNAs. They had new recognition sequences and
bound now in front and behind exon 23 of the dystrophin pre-mRNA to sites
important for the splicing process. Thus, these splice sites were blocked and
exon 23 was removed together with the introns during the splicing of the
pre-mRNA (exon skipping). As the point mutation of the mdx mice is localized
in exon 23, the removal of this exon had the consequence that the mdx muscle
cells, which could not make any normal dystrophin, now produced a slightly
shortened dystrophin protein which was localized at its correct site underneath
the cell membrane.
The aim of this fundamental in-vitro gene
experiment - outside of the living mouse - was to prove that the muscle
cells themselves can produce the therapeutic antisense oligribonucleotides.
For a human application, U7-snRNAs adapted to the individual
mutation of the patient would have to be used, whose gene must then be
transported with a gene therapeutic vector into the cell nuclei of the muscle
fibers. An alternative would be an ex-vivo transfer transporting the U7-snRNA
genes into satellite cells or other muscle stem cells and then injecting them
into the blood stream or directly into the muscles. As the U7-snRNA genes are
very short, this transfer would probably be easier than the transfer of the
cDNA for the entire or the shortened dystrophin as is being tried with other
methods (Weis, Bern; Lochmüller, Munich).
Homologous recombination:
The point
mutation in the dystrophin gene of mdx mice could be repaired in 15 to 20 % of
isolated myoblasts by the addition of a DNA string of 603 base pairs whose
sequence is the same as the sequence before and after the mutation site of
exon 23 of the mice but not containing the C-to-T exchange of the mutation.
Part of the new gene segment was exchanged against the corresponding, the
homologous, in exon 23. This short fragment homologous recombination, SFHR,
technique was then applied to isolated myoblasts from a Duchenne patient with a
deletion of exon 13 (Kapsa, Melbourne).
Ignoring a premature stop codon by antibiotics:
About 5 % of
Duchenne boys have a point mutation in their dystrophin gene which changed an
amino acid code word into one of the three stop codons, TGA, TAG and TAA,
after which the synthesis of dystrophin stops prematurely.
Gentamicin is an antibiotic that causes the RNA
translation mechanism in the ribosomes to ignore such a premature stop
codon, i.e. to read through it. The normal stop codons, which are
protected by a special three-dimensional structure, will, however, be
respected as before. In mdx-mice, up to 20 % of the normal amount of new and
functional dystrophin has been obtained in this way. Gentamicin has the advantage
of being a well known drug whose use as a possible therapy for Duchenne
muscular dystrophy would not need long approval procedures
(Sweeney, Philadelphia).
In order to confirm these positive results, two other
studies with mdx mice were performed which showed, however, that under similar
conditions after a treatment with gentamicin no new dystrophin could be
detected (Karpati, Montreal; Lochmüller, Munich).
Two clinical studies with gentamicin have been performed
on Duchenne boys but have also not led to new dystrophin. Possibly the
14-day trial period was insufficient. Therefore, another and longer lasting
clinical trial with 36 patients is now being performed
(Mendell, Columbus).
Replacement of dystrophin
Utrophin is a muscular protein present
in small amounts also in Duchenne patients
In larger quantities it could take over the function of dystrophin.
Upregulation of the utrophin gene:
Utrophin is a
protein with a structure and function very similar to dystrophin. In humans,
its gene is located on chromosome 6, it has 75 exons and is about one million
base pairs long. The utrophin protein is about 7 % shorter than dystrophin.
It is present in many body tissues, also in muscle, but there it is concentrated
in regions where the motor nerves contact the muscle membrane. Before birth,
the utrophin concentration in muscle is much higher than afterwards.
This protein, though it is present only in small amounts, makes the Duchenne
symptoms less severe than they would be if utrophin were also missing. In fact,
mdx-mice whose utrophin gene was knocked out experimentally, which thus
have neither dystrophin nor utrophin, have Duchenne-like symptoms and die early
in contrast to "normal" mdx mice whose muscles hardly degenerate.
Experiments with mice have shown, that utrophin, if it is
present in larger amounts, can replace dystrophin. The mice used were transgenic
mice who contained utrophin mini genes in their germ line, introduced by a
technique that cannot be used in humans. Other transgenic mice were raised
which produced utrophin only when they were given the antibiotic tetracyclin
in their drinking water. The increased amount of utrophin prevented the
development of Duchenne symptoms, and this effect was more pronounced in
newborn than in 10 or 30 day old mice.
For a possible Duchenne therapy, another strategy is
followed, namely to increase the normally low amount of utrophin by
upregulation of the activity of its gene. To achieve this, an
activating substance is needed, which could well be a known drug, or some
other chemical or a naturally occurring substance.
During the last years, synthetic chemistry has developed
methods to automatically produce thousands of partly unknown substances.
Many of these substances are being tested in the laboratory, also automatically,
on cell cultures from mdx mice for their ability to activate the gene of
luciferase, which is preceded by the two promoters of the utrophin gene.
The light producing enzyme luciferase from fireflies is easier to detect
than utrophin. Every hit, i.e., every substance which shows at least a low
activity in these preliminary tests, is further modified, and then, all
these similar substances are tested first on muscle cell cultures, and, if
they react positively, in living mdx mice, too, to see whether they can also
upregulate the utrophin gene. Only after one or several convincingly active
substances are found, would it be possible to start clinical studies with
Duchenne patients in a few years (Davies, Oxford).
Such an activator of the utrophin gene could, if it is a
small molecule, be applied via the blood stream from where it would reach
all the muscles. And the immune system would recognize an additional amount
of utrophin as a substance of its own because it is already present in small
amounts in Duchenne boys. Therefore, no immune rejection should develop.
However, something that upregulates the utrophin gene,
could also do the same with other genes. Thus, before such an activator is
tested in children, it should be made certain that it does not produce any
undesirable side effects.
Other experiments to increase utrophin:
The transfer
of a shortened utrophin gene with adenoviruses into dystrophic dogs led to
utrophin which could take over the function of the missing
dystrophin. --- Glucocorticoides, among them prednisone, can upregulate
the utrophin gene to some extent. --- Such corticoides have also been isolated
from Chinese plant medicines which traditionally are used against
muscular dystrophy. --- Low grade chronic inflammation in muscles
of mdx mice leads to a marked upregulation of utrophin on the membrane outside
of the contacta with the motor nerves. --- The amino acid L-arginine can
increase the amount of utrophin in mdx mice and alleviate significantly the
dystrophic symptoms. The enzyme nitric oxide synthase uses arginine for
the production of the biologically active gas nitric oxide. But nitric oxide is
also active in other biological processes. Arginine, therefore, cannot be used
for a Duchenne therapy without further investigations. --- The small
protein heregulin with which the motor nerves stimulate muscle
development can also significantly alleviate the symptoms of mdx mice. --- One
end of the utrophin mRNA is not translated into protein, but binds to structures
at the contact regions of the nerves, thus restricting utrophin to these sites.
If this binding could be prevented by a drug, it might become possible to
distribute utrophin more evenly over the entire muscle membrane so that it
can better replace dystrophin. --- Another form of utrophin, the very
similar B-utrophin was recently identified in blood vessels. But
only the "normal" A-utrophin is present in muscles and can
partially compensate for dystrophin after upregulation of its gene.
Other proteins
The mutations
of the dystrophin gene and the absence of dystrophin
influence the activities of many other genes.
Activities of thousands of muscle genes:
In order to
measure simultaneously the activities of very many genes in one tissue sample
in a single experiment, gene arrays are used. As the sequences of
practically all human genes are known, short segments of thousands of genes
can be produced automatically and applied by a robot in a certain pattern to a
quartz chip a few square centimeters in size. If biochemically produced DNA
copies of the mRNAs of all active genes are applied as an analysis sample to the
chip, light points appear at those chip sites where there are complementary DNA
sequences of these active genes. The light intensity of these points is
automatically measured which then makes it possible to determine which genes
are active and to what extent and which are not active.
With this expression profiling, several thousand genes
in muscle samples were tested which came from normal and mdx mice, from
healthy and Duchenne boys, from transgenic mice which neither had their own
dystrophin nor utrophin, and also from other mice which instead had human
dystrophin in their muscles.
The results showed that the absence of dystrophin causes
the increase and the decrease of the activities of many muscle genes. A whole
series of genes which are responsible for the energy production in muscle cells
were less active in mice without dystrophin and utrophin, i.e. their muscles
had an energy crisis which contributed to the degeneration of their dystrophic
muscles. On the other hand, many genes necessary for the development and repair
of muscles were increased in their activities, in some cases by a hundred times,
i.e., they were upregulated by the disease process. Similar results were
obtained with human muscle samples.
Further experiments showed that in mice many other genes were
upregulated, genes which are involved in the development of surface
structures, in the production of signal factors for protein synthesis, in the
intensification of immune reactions, and in other processes responsible for
the muscle dystrophic symptoms of mdx mice. In Duchenne patients, these
changes were less pronounced, and in transgenic mice with human dystrophin,
these gene activities were normal, because they no longer had a muscular
dystrophy.
After these first results were obtained a few years ago,
many more experiments with this new technique were performed to answer other
questions of Duchenne research. Their and future results will help to understand
the complex relationship between the many parts of the muscular architecture
and its changes if one of its most important components, dystrophin, is absent.
This will open new avenues for the development of a Duchenne therapy
(van Ommen, Leiden; Kunkel, Boston; Hoffman, Washington,
and others).
A dystrophic worm:
Caenorhabditis elegans is
a 0.9 millimeter long transparent worm which is used extensively by gene
researchers because all its 19,733 genes are known and also all its 959
body cells, 95 of which are muscle cells. Its muscles have a dystrophin similar
to the dystrophin of humans, which can also have mutations causing dystrophic
symptoms.
Individual genes were inactivated and also activated so that the dystrophic
symptoms could be studied which were caused by the missing or increased
gene activities. E.g., it could be shown that the upregulation of
dystrobrevin, a very short form of dystrophin, slowed down the muscle
degeneration significantly. Further investigations will contribute to the
clarification of still unknown molecular relationships during the development
of muscular dystrophy (Ségalat, Lyon).
Integrins and synthrophins:
Integrins are
a family of proteins which are located in the muscle cell membrane. They are
necessary for the fusion of myoblasts to myotubes and the development of
myotubes to mature muscle cells. They also participate in the propagation of
signals from cell to cell.
In mice without dystrophin and utrophin, the amount of one
of these integrins was increased about twofold by gene transfer. This extended
the life expectancy of the mice by threefold, and their dystrophic symptoms
ameliorated significantly (Kaufman, Urbana).
The five known syntrophins are proteins that mediate
the interaction of signalling proteins with the dystrophin and utrophin complexes
at the muscle cell membrane. Understanding these effects in more detail may
have consequences for a therapy with utrophin (Froehner, Seattle).
Pharmacological strategies
Corticosteroids and other drugs can ameliorate the symptoms
of Duchenne muscular dystrophy without curing the disease itself.
As long as
the efforts to transfer a functional dystrophin gene or to repair the damaged
gene have not led to a cure, attempts are being made to at least alleviate the
symptoms of Duchenne dystrophy by a drug treatment. There has recently been
some success in this area.
Myostatin:
The "blue-white" Belgian
cattle have existed for about 200 years, they have 20 % more muscle meat
than normal animals. Six years ago, it was found that these cows have a
deletion of 11 base pairs in the gene for the protein myostatin.
Transgenic mice without a myostatin gene are two to three times as heavy as
normal mice, not because they have more muscle cells, but because their muscle
cells are much larger. Myostatin is a signal protein, a kind of hormone, it
consists of 375 amino acids and is necessary for limiting muscle mass.
This protein is produced in the muscle cells and their
precursor cells, after which the protein is modified: two thirds of the
amino acid chain is removed, and two of the remaining chains with 109 amino
acids each form a double ring. This active myostatin inhibits the growth
of the muscle cells by negatively influencing the genetic regulation of the
myogenic precursor cells. Other factors are also involved in optimizing muscle
mass.
These facts led to the assumption that by blocking the
activity of myostatin, the muscles of Duchenne boys could be made larger or at
least their destruction reduced. Therefore, monoclonal antibodies were made,
i.e., immune proteins that attach themselves very specifically only to myostatin
and thus inactivate it. These antibodies were injected once a week under the
diaphragm of mdx mice. After three months, the treated animals were 12 % heavier
than control animals without treatment because their muscle mass had increased.
In addition, they had a better muscle function, they could better cling to a
rotating glass rod, their muscle degeneration had decreased and the CK activities
were practically normal.
Further experiments are now being performed with mice. They
have to be repeated with dystrophic dogs whose dystrophy is more similar to the
human disease than the dystrophy of the mice. Only when the results are positive
could clinical trials with Duchenne patients begin.
This treatment method would not be a cure of Duchenne muscular dystrophy
because the genetic cause of the disease would not be eliminated. But, compared
with other methods, it would have advantages: no immune or toxicity problems,
no genetic risks by viruses, and easy manufacturing of the drug. Pharmaceutical
companies are already interested in this technique because increasing the muscle
mass would also be important for older persons and people with other
muscle-degrading diseases (Khurana, Philadelphia).
Glucocorticoides:
The related
corticoides prednisone, prednisolone, and deflazacort delay
muscle degeneration, but the cause of this effect is not yet known. While part
of their action likely involves their anti-inflammatory properties, other
mechanisms of action are also possible. By analyzing the activities of more
than one thousand genes in prednisone-treated mdx mice with the new micro array
technique, it was found that about 5 % of the genes showed reduced or increased
activities. Further analysis of the pattern of gene expression induced by
glucocorticoids will help to understand the molecular mechanism of action of
glucocorticoids in skeletal muscle. This might help to develop a more specific
but less toxic treatment with these drugs (Muntoni, London).
Creatine
can possibly
also slow down muscle degeneration. It is a natural compound which is eaten in
large quantities by athletes for enhancement of performance. Creatine when bound
to phosphoric acid provides energy not only for muscle contraction but also for
the removal of superfluous calcium, one of the causes of destruction of muscle
cells. Experiments with mdx mice have shown that creatine supplementation can
improve their disease symptoms, and this may provide a scientific basis for its
use as supplementary therapy for Duchenne dystrophy
(Wallimann, Zürich; Rüegg, Lausanne).
Other pharmacological experiments:
Extracts of
green tea in the food of mdx mice slowed down the degeneration of some
of their muscles, possibly because this tea contains anti-oxidant
substances. --- Transgenic mice were raised which produced in their muscles
the muscle insulin-like growth factor 1 (mIGF1) in relatively large
amounts. This increased muscle mass by up to 40 %, and fibrosis as well as muscle
degeneration were decreased and the regeneration significantly
improved. --- Leupeptin consists of three
partly modified amino acids. Combined with carnitine, it inhibits the enzyme
calpain which destroys proteins in the muscle cells when, as in Duchenne
dystrophy, calcium enters in an uncontrolled way. In experiments with monkeys
and mice, muscle degeneration was significantly slowed down by
leupeptin. --- The concentration of the enzyme nitric oxide synthase in
the dystrophin complex of mdx mice is significantly reduced. Therefore, its
product, the biologically active gas nitric oxide, can no longer fulfil its
function. This contributes to muscle degeneration. Transgenic mdx mice with the
normal amount of nitric oxide synthase showed reduced dystrophic
symptoms. --- In mdx mice, the signal protein JNK1 is activated and
this contributes to the degeneration of muscle cells. The injection of
adenoviruses carrying the gene for the natural protein JIP1 inhibits the
activity of JNK1, and this reduces muscle degeneration. --- The
protein galectin-1 participates in the processes leading to new and
regenerated muscle tissue. Fibroblasts obtained from the skin of newborn mice
develop into muscle cells with dystrophin if they grow in a cell culture which
contains galectin-1. Such fibroblasts could be easily collected from a Duchenne
patient, transformed into muscle cells with galectin-1, then genetically
modified to synthesize normal dystrophin, and finally transplanted back into
the patient.
Clinical studies with Duchenne patients
The first gene transfer
trial and a new trial with myoblasts have begun.
Cortisteroids, creatine, and other chemical substances are studied.
A large study with prednisone together with cyclosporin is being prepared.
Clinical
studies with Duchenne boys will be more and more necessary in view of the
increasingly positive results with experimental animals. These studies with
humans will have to be performed in several steps, of which the first one,
phase I, will already take several years to prove that the new treatment
will not be accompanied by unacceptable side effects. Only afterwards can further
studies be started with sick children to ascertain whether the treatment really
improves or maintains the muscle force, phase II, and what the optimal
dosage will be, phase III.
All these studies have to be performed double-blind,
i.e., only about half of the patients receives the substance to be tested
whereas the other half receives an inactive compound, a placebo. And neither
the patients nor the researchers are allowed to know which patient belongs to
which group before the trial is completed, the code is broken and the results
are analyzed. These studies and the approval procedures are time consuming, they
take many years, and are expensive to perform.
Transfer of the dystrophin gene with plasmids:
The first phase
of the first gene transfer experiment with Duchenne patients has been
completed at the beginning of 2003 and the results reported in June 2003.
The biotechnology company Transgène in Strasbourg together with
the French muscular dystrophy association AFM started to prepare this
gene therapy approach in 1995. The permission for this first human trial was
given by the French authorities in November 1999, and the first injections of
the vectors were performed in September 2000 at the Hôpital de la
Pitié Salpêtière in Paris.
The 9 participating boys were all older than 15 years so that
they could give their informed consent. They did not derive any clinical
benefit from this treatment, it was not yet a therapy.
After several gene transfer methods were tested on dystrophic
mice and dogs, it was decided to use the entire cDNA of the gene for
the full-length dystrophin placed in a plasmid as vector together with
a strong promoter from a virus. Plasmids have the advantage of not containing
any protein and thus should not cause an immune reaction. The therapeutic gene
to be transported has no protein either, it is pure or naked DNA.
In further preliminary experiments with muscle cell cultures
and mice, it was shown that this vector construction led to the appearance of
new dystrophin at its correct place underneath the muscle cell membrane of the
animals, that it restored the dystrophin-glycoprotein complex, and that it
prolonged the life of the cells.
The aim of this clinical study with Duchenne patients was
to show that the procedure is safe, i.e., that is does not lead to an immune
reaction or an inflammation, and that new and normal dystrophin appears at the
correct places in those fibers of the muscle which had received
the plasmid vector.
A solution containing 0.2 mg of plasmids with 10 trillion
(10 x 1012) copies of the dystrophin gene was injected into one
muscle of the forearm of the first three patients. This is a very small
amount of genetic material compared to similar experiments in animals. The
next three patients received one dose of 0.6 mg and the last three two doses of
0.6 mg two weeks apart. The safety of the patients was the main concern,
therefore, any one patient was treated only when it was certain that the
previous one treated did not show any signs of immune intolerance.
Three weeks after the injections, the treated muscle area
of about 0.5 cubic centimeters was extracted by biopsy and checked for
the presence of dystrophin. In three out of six boys in the first two groups
and in all three boys in the third group, new dystrophin appeared in less than
1 % to more than 25 % of the muscle fibers around the injection sites. There
were no signs of an immune reaction, neither to the plasmid nor to the newly
produced dystrophin. This answered the question of a phase-I study:
Gene transfer with naked DNA is a safe procedure. It could, after
amplification, become a therapeutic method because it is known from animal
experiments that dystrophin production in about 20 % of muscle fibers would
improve muscle function significantly.
The French scientists are now working with the team of
Jon Wolff in Madison in the United States, who injected similar plasmid
constructions with genes of a marker protein into the blood stream of limbs of
rats, dogs, and monkeys under pressure. Afterwards, up to 40 % of the
muscle fibers contained the transferred marker protein.
The next step will be to apply this arterial delivery procedure
in Duchenne boys, probably in a clinical trial starting in 2004. At that stage,
it is planned to treat, again for safety reasons, only a small foot muscle.
Should the results be positive, this method will be tried on entire arm or leg
muscles. This could be planned for 2006.
Afterwards, respiratory and cardiac muscles could be
targeted. For safety reasons, it is impossible to proceed faster, because
it would be a catastrophe should severe side effects or any other undesired
event happen which would lead to the interruption of this and other gene
therapy experiments (Braun, Strasbourg).
Clinical studies with myoblasts (myoblast transfer):
At the beginning of 2003, a clinical phase-I trial with 5 to 15 year
old Duchenne boys with deletions has started in Québec City in
Canada. It should answer the question whether the transfer of normal myoblasts
under modified conditions is safe, i.e., that it does not create an immune
rejection or inflammation, and whether new dystrophin appears after the
treatment.
The difference with regard to the unsuccessful experiments
performed in 1990 is that the much more effective immune inhibitor FK506
(Tacrolimus) A is used instead of cyclosporin, that not, as before, 60 to 90
million cells are injected into the entire biceps muscle, but 30 million cells
into the foot muscle tibialis anterior by multiple applications at a distance
of one millimeter from each other into a muscle volume of only one cubic
centimeter. An improvement of the muscle function is not expected. As in the
French trial, the participants will have no therapeutic benefit from
these injections.
One month after the treatment and after a biopsy it will be
determined whether normal dystrophin DNA, mRNA and protein have appeared and
whether there were any immune reactions. Three patients have been treated until
July 2003, the entire trial should be finished before the end of 2003.
If the results are positive, the trial will continue with
a phase-II study, during which myoblasts will be transferred into the entire
biceps muscle. Then, during the following two years, the muscle force will be
measured which, as is hoped, will have possibly increased or at least remained
unchanged (Trembley, Québec City).
Prednisone and deflazacort:
Sixteen
clinical studies worldwide had proven the ability of glucocorticoides, cortisone
derivatives, especially of prednisone, to maintain the muscle force of
Duchenne boys. A few years ago, there were indications that the new corticoid
deflazacort, which is related to prednisone, would act similarly
but would show fewer side effects.
From 1992 to 1997, a study with the participation of 14
German muscle centers was performed in which the muscle maintaining effects
of these two drugs were compared with the well documented natural history of
the disease. The doses were 0.75 mg per kg body weight and day for prednisone
and 0.9 mg per kg and day for deflazacort. The result was that both drugs can
maintain the muscle force for at least two to three years and, in isolated cases,
prolong walking ability until about the 14th year. The most important
side effect of prednisone was weight gain in about 20 % of the patients. With
deflazacort, slight cataracts, clouding of the eye lens, were more frequent than
with prednisone. Both drugs had a growth retarding effect, other side effects
were insignificant. After stopping the medication, muscle degeneration and normal
growth resumed again.
The results of the study do not yet allow a decision on the
best time to begin the treatment, e.g. before five years of age. Children who
wish to begin this treatment should do this in the setting of a well documented
study in order to obtain more information and, because of the side effects, to
guarantee the necessary controls. The study in Germany is continued as an open
trial with long-term documentation which includes data for some patients who
were treated for more than seven years (Reitter, Mainz).
Prednisolone:
In the United
Kingdom, a large long-term trial had been prepared which should have tested
whether prednisolone is able to prolong walking ability and to improve
life quality. An intermittent treatment, 10 days with and 10 days without
medication had been planned. Because financing could not be obtained, it is
now only possible to conduct an open study, not double-blind, with the aim of
documenting efficacy and side effects (Muntoni, London).
Prednisone combined with cyclosporin A:
In Germany, a
clinical study is being prepared to start at the end of 2003 which should
answer two questions: Can cyclosporin A alone increase muscle force
over a short time? And can a combination of cyclosporin
A and prednisone better reduce the loss of force over the long term
than prednisone alone, when prednisone is given intermittently, i.e., in a
cycle of 10 days with and 10 days without therapy? As immune processes play a
role in Duchenne muscular dystrophy, earlier experiments have shown that
immunsuppressant drugs such as cyclosporin A may delay muscle degeneration.
In order to obtain reliable results, at least 150 Duchenne
patients should participate who are unequivically diagnosed, who are older
than six years, and who can still walk alone for 50 meters. During the first
phase lasting three months, all children will receive, in a double-blind
procedure 3.5 to 4 mg/kg/day cyclosporin A alone or galactose, milk sugar, as
placebo. During the second phase lasting 12 months, all children will receive
in addition 0.75 mg/kg/day prednisone for 10 days followed by 10 days
without prednisone. Eight German muscle centers will perform this trial
(Korinthenberg, Freiburg).
Creatine:
A double-blind
study with 8 Duchenne, 10 Becker, and 18 patients with other muscle diseases
showed after 8 weeks with daily doses of 5 grams creatine monohydrate for
children and 10 grams for adults a slight but significant beneficial short-term
effect on muscle strength and performance without any side effects. More clinical
studies have to be made before creatine can be recommended as a long-term muscle
preserving medication for Duchenne boys (Walter, Munich).
In Canada, a trial to determine the effect of creatine has
started with 40 Duchenne boys. --- In Belgium, creatine was tested for three
months on 12 Duchenne and 3 Becker patients with the result of a slightly
increased muscle force.
Oxandrolone, an anabolic steroid
sometimes used by athletes, was tried in a study with 51 Duchenne boys.
However, the small improvement of muscle strength found does not justify
its use as a drug instead of prednisone or deflazacort
(Fenichel, Nashville).
International clinical tests:
The
Cooperative International Neuromuscular Research Group, CINRG, in
Washington, a cooperation of laboratories in the US, in Canada, Belgium,
Argentina, Australia, and India, organizes clinical trials on Duchenne boys
with substances some of which have been selected from 45 substances which had
shown positive results when many compounds had been tested in a large screening
experiment with mice.
Albuterol, an asthma drug, had shown a significant
increase of muscle strength (about 8 %) and very few side effects in a
preliminary trial with 10 Duchenne boys. In August 2002, a double blind
study has started with 25 - 30 boys to last about 9 months.
A trial with coenzyme Q10 started in September 2001
with 15 boys which also regularly receive deflazacort or prednisone. Another
trial is planned with patients in wheelchairs.
Oxatomide, an antihistamine, is being tested in a
9 months trial with 15 Duchenne boys.
Pentoxifylline interferes with the immune system and
thus reduces inflammation and fibrosis. A trial started in February 2003
and will last 15 months.
A trial lasting 15 months has started in January 2003 to
compare the positive and negative effects of prednisone when it is given
every day or only on two days each week at a higher dosage.
A trial with 54 Duchenne boys was performed for 6 months
ending in March 2003 in which either creatine or glutamine was
tested in a double blind study. The results are being evaluated.
Trials with three other substances, taurine,
carnitine, and nicotinic acid, are planned.
For the documentation and supervision of these studies,
standardized control methods have been developed to measure not only muscle
functions but also other parameters such as the quality of life. Some of these
methods are being modified so that they can be also used for very young and older
patients (Escolar, Washington).
When will there be a therapy?
Duchenne
muscular dystrophy has always been with man and all animals with skeletal
muscles. Its clinical symptoms were described quite correctly for the first
time in 1851 by the English doctor Edward Meryon. But, it got its name
after the French physician Duchenne de Boulogne, who, in 1861, described
not only its symptoms but also the muscular changes, its histology.
From its mode of inheritance, it was known at the beginning
of the 20th century that a defect on the X chromosome is responsible
for the disease. But only in 1986 was the gene itself, the
dystrophin gene, identified (Kunkel, Boston) and shortly afterwards
the protein dystrophin characterized (Hoffman, Washington),
which is missing in Duchenne boys. The fast pace of genetic research gave rise
to the hope that it would soon be possible to replace or repair the gene and
thus cure the disease.
However, this optimism was premature. The first studies
in 1991 with the myoblast transfer showed that this technique, which
looked promising in mice, was ineffective in Duchenne boys. Now, 17
years after the detection of the gene, there is still no therapy for Duchenne
muscular dystrophy. As this report shows, research work is being done with many
different methods which are tested in mice, dogs, and monkeys, and some already
in Duchenne boys. But these studies are time consuming, and the approval of a
treatment will take additional years.
However, there are examples of treatments that reach patients
very quickly, such as Gleevec, a drug which was approved in 2001 within
a few months without examining all side effects after it was shown that it could
cure about 90 % of patients with the blood cancer chronic myeloid leukemia.
All the research results must be considered and many more
obtained before it is possible to make any prediction of how long it will take
until a safe and effective treatment is ready for children with Duchenne muscular
dystrophy everywhere in the world. The answer to this question is the most
important one for the parents and their sick sons. It will probably still take
many years, until Duchenne muscular dystrophy will be defeated. This is less
than what has been hoped for, that is the negative side of this difficult
problem, the positive is that hundreds of capable and dedicated researchers in
many laboratories around the world are working on a cure: therefore,
it is certain that an effective treatment will be there, sooner or later.
Scientists mentioned in this report
Only the
scientists mentioned in this report are listed with their abbreviated addresses
and without any titles. Most of them are professors and all have an MD or PhD.
Further information including many original publications, which contain the
names of all members of a research team, can be obtained from the author of
this report.
Richard J. Bartlett, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
Laurent Bernheim, Hôpital Cantonal Universitaire, Genf
Serge Braun, Synthetic Vector Products, Transgène S.A., Strasbourg
Kevin P. Campbell, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA
Jeffrey Chamberlain, Dept. of Neurology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
Paula Clemens, Dept. of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
Judith C. T. van Deutekom, Dept. of Human Genetics, Leiden University Med. Center, Leiden
Kay Davies, Dept. of Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford
Diana Escolar, Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC
Gerald M. Fenichel, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
Kevin M. Flanigan, Dept. of Neurology and Pathology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
Stanley Froehner, Dept. of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, Seattle WA
Stuart Hodgetts, University of Western Australia, Crawley
Eric Hoffman, Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC
Paul C. Holland, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal
Johnny Huard, Children's Hospital, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
Robert Kapsa, Melbourne Neuromuscular Research Institute, Melbourne
George Karpati, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal
Stephen Kaufman, Dept. of Cell and Structural Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL
Tejvir S. Khurana, Pennsylvania Muscle Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
Stefan Kochanek, Zentrum für Molekularmedizin, University of Cologne
Louis Kunkel, Harvard University, Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
Hanns Lochmüller, Genzentrum der Universität, Munich
Jerry Mendell, Dept. of Neurology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
Clemens Müller-Reible, Humangenetisches Institut, Biozentrum der Universität, Würzburg
Francesco Muntoni, Dept. of Paediatrics, Imperial College School of Medicine, London
Roel Nusse, Dept. of Developmental Biology, Stanford University, Stanford
Gertjan B. van Ommen, Dept. of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden
Terrence Partridge, Muscle Cell Biology Group, Hammersmith Hospital, London
Thomas Rando, Dept. of Neurology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
Bernd Reitter, Kinderklinik der Universität, Mainz
Michael Rudnicki, Ottawa Health Research Institute, Ottawa
Urs T. Rüegg, Ecole de Pharmacie de l'Université, Lausanne
Günter Scheuerbrandt, Testlaboratorium Breitnau, Breitnau near Freiburg
H. Lee Sweeney, Dept. of Physiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
James G. Tidball, Dept. of Physiological Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles
Jacques Tremblay, Unité de Génétique Humaine, Université Laval, Québec City
Theo Wallimann, Institut für Zellbiologie, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule, Zürich
Maggie C. Walter, Friedrich-Baur-Institut, Medizinische Klinik der Universität, Munich
Dominic Wells, Dept. of Neuromuscular Diseases, Imperial College of Medicine, London
Steve Wilton, Australian Neuromuscular Research Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth
Jon Wolff, Dept. of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin Medical School, Madison, WI
Guenter Scheuerbrandt PhD, Im Talgrund 2, D-79874 Breitnau, Germany.
Tel.: +49-7652-91813-0, Fax: +49-7652-91813-13, e-Mail: gscheuerbrandt@t-online.de
This report will be updated from time to time with new research results.
Those who wish to receive the updates and the 2004 version of the report
should send their e-mail address to Dr. Scheuerbrandt.
Exon Skipping, an Example
Here, the molecular details of skipping
exon 46 are explained with which the Duchenne muscular dystrophy caused by the
exon 45 deletion is changed to a Becker muscular dystrophy.
Part of the base sequence of exons 45 and 46 of the mRNA of
the dystrophin gene is shown as well as the end of exon 44 and the beginning
of exon 47. In exon 45, 50 triplets are not shown and 30 in exon 46. Below each
triplet (codon), the abbreviated the name of the amino acid is shown according
to the genetic code. The triplets follow each other without spaces, the hyphens
indicate here only the reading frame and the vertical lines the borders of the
exons. The exon-skipping "therapeutic" oligoribonucleotide attaches
itself to the underlined 19 bases in exon 46 of the pre-mRNA. The three bases
of the hidden stop signal are also underlined. Exon 45 ends after the second
base of the last triplet, which then is completed to AGG by the first base of
exon 46 (-AGG-AG | G-CUA-).
| End Exon 44 |
| |
Start Exon 45 |
End Exon 45 |
| |
Start Exon 46 |
| -UGG-UAU-CUU-AAG |
| |
GAA-CUC-CAG-GAU--- |
AGA-AAA-AAG-AG |
| |
G-CUA-GAA-GAA- |
| trp tyr leu lys |
| |
glu leu gln asp |
arg lys lys arg |
| |
leu glu glu |
hidden stop code
antisense oligoribonucleotide
GUC-GUU-GAU-UUU-UUU-UUC-G
End Exon 46 |
--AAU-GAA-UUU---AAA-GAG-CAG-CAA-CUA-AAA-GAA-AAG-CUU-GAG-CAA-GUC-AAG |
asn glu phe lys glu gln gln leu lys glu lys leu glu gln val lys |
| Start Exon 47
| UUA-CUG-GUG-GAA-GAG-UUG---
| leu leu val glu glu leu
If only exon 45 is missing in the mRNA, the reading frame in exon 46 is shifted one nucleotide to the left, exon 46 then starts
| instead of |
| |
G-CUA-GAA-GAA-C |
with |
|
| |
GCU-AGA-AGA-ACA |
| |
| |
leu glu glu |
|
|
| |
ala arg arg thr |
with the consequence that 16 incorrect amino acids are incorporated into the dystrophin until finally a
premature stop signal UGA is reached which was hidden before
(-AAU-GAA-UUU- is changed to
-AAA-UGA-AUU-, the hidden UGA is
underlined above). The protein synthesis is interrupted prematurely, the
dystrophin remains incomplete, and Duchenne muscular dystrophy develops.
After the deletion of exon 45, exon 44 is followed directly by exon 46:
| End Exon 44 |
| |
Start Exon 46 |
| -UGG-UAU-CUU-AAG |
| |
GCU-AGA-AGA-ACA---AGA-UUU-AAA-UGA-AUU-UGU-UUU |
| AUG- |
|
|
| trp tyr leu lys |
| |
ala arg arg thr arg phe lys STOP! |
If in addition to the missing exon 45, exon
46 is also removed, the reading frame is not disturbed, there is no premature
stop signal, but 108 amino acids are missing in the central part of the
dystrophin, which, however, is still partly functional. This changes the
severe Duchenne muscular dystrophy in the much less severe Becker muscular
dystrophy.
| End Exon 44 |
| |
Start Exon 47 |
| ---UAC-AAA-UGG-UAU-CUU-AAG |
| |
UUA-CUG-GUG-GAA-GAG-UUG--- |
| tyr lys trp tyr leu lys |
| |
leu leu val glu glu leu |
|